GroupImage
Amaral & Associates, P.C.
65 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02110 - Phone: (617) 742-2020 - Fax: (617) 742-2019
246 Revere Street, Winthrop, MA 02152 - Phone: (617) 539-1010 - Fax: (617) 539-0505
www.amarallaw.com
edamaral@amarallaw.com


More divorced parents have ‘visitation’ over the Internet


The explosion of webcams, video e-mail, text-messaging and social media in the last few years has changed the way visitation with children after divorce occurs in many cases.

Of course, nothing will ever replace physically spending time with a child. But when that’s not possible, there’s no question that seeing a child live over a webcam and speaking in real time can provide a better experience than letters or phone calls.

As a result, some courts have begun requiring “virtual visitation” in divorce cases. This is especially true where the divorcing parents live far apart, where one parent moves out-of-state after the separation, or where a parent travels regularly on business.

For many older children, webcams and text-messaging are an important part of the fabric of daily life, and allowing visitation through these channels can make a parent feel more “connected” to their child than they would if visitation were limited to an occasional stand-alone get-together.

Virtual visitation has also been used in some cases where a parent was incarcerated or where there were allegations of domestic violence.

Here are some things to think about when considering a plan for visitation online:

• What types of communication will work best: e-mails, texting, videochat?

 

How about a website for shared pictures and information?

• If the arrangement requires a parent with custody to get a high-speed Internet connection or a new laptop, who should pay?

• Is the custodial parent allowed to be in the room during a webchat? Can he or she access e-mails, websites, etc. involving the other parent?

• Is there any enforcement mechanism if the parent with custody interferes with the virtual visitation, as there would be if the parent interfered with physical visitation?

The specifics will vary based on the age of the children, the technological savvy of the parents (and the children), and the nature of the parents’ relationship.

Nevertheless, new forms of electronic communication are here to say, and there’s no question that the rules of visitation will change to keep up with them.


Line


Making gifts or loans to your children? Mention this in your will


Many parents make gifts or loans to their children. Often they give more money to one child than to others, perhaps because one child has a greater need.

If you do make a significant gift or loan to one of your heirs, you should modify your will to address it.

The reason: If something happens to you, it might be unclear to your heirs what the effect of the gifts or loans should be on their inheritance. In some families, this kind of uncertainty can lead to family battles and even a legal challenge to the will. But even if this doesn’t happen, some children might be quietly offended or simply uncertain, and you probably want to avoid that if possible.

So if you are leaving some children more assets in your will than others as a result of gifts made during your lifetime, it’s a good idea to explain your reasoning in your will. If you’re leaving all your children equal shares in spite of having given some of them more gifts than others in your lifetime, you should say that as well – so there’s no question whether the lifetime gifts should be treated as an “advance” on their

 

inheritance.

What if a loan is outstanding at the time you die? You might want to make clear that any such loan doesn’t have to be repaid, and doesn’t affect the distribution in your will. On the other hand, if you want the loan to be treated as an advance against an inheritance, you should make that clear.

If you want a loan to be repaid after your death or to be treated as an advance against an inheritance, then you should have a written loan agreement with your child. You might also want to specify in the agreement that any forgiveness has to be in writing, so your child can’t claim after you die that at some point you forgave the loan.


Line


Cities and states can be sued for dangerous roads


Most people know that you can sue another driver for causing an accident, but not many people know that in certain cases you may be able to sue a city or state if an accident is caused by a dangerous condition of a road.

The law varies from state to state, but governments often have a legal duty to keep a road safe.

Sometimes an accident is caused not by driver error but by poor maintenance. For instance, street lights or traffic signals might not be working properly, or trees and bushes might have been allowed to grow to the point where they obscure warning signs.

Sometimes the problem is poor design, such as a curve that’s too sharp for the type of roadway.

An unusual lawsuit of this variety occurred recently in California. A motorcyclist was riding at night on scenic

 

Highway 1 near Carmel when he struck a pack of wild pigs. He sustained massive head injuries, was in a coma for several months and is confined to a wheelchair.

He sued the state, claiming it had repeated notice of the serious danger posed by feral swine and had never put up fences or otherwise acted to protect motorists.

A jury found that the state acted carelessly and created a dangerous condition that led to the accident.

At trial, half a dozen other motorists testified to their own terrifying, late-night run-ins with the pigs.

The motorcyclist produced evidence that a pig on the highway at night is invisible until it is about 80 feet away – which gives a driver less than a second to respond.


Line


Supreme Court limits age discrimination lawsuits


Older workers will have a harder time suing for age discrimination as a result of a recent Supreme Court ruling.

The ruling makes it more difficult to sue for age discrimination than it is to sue for other types of bias, such as sex, race, religion, or national origin.

This is true for two reasons:

* First, employees who sue for age discrimination now have to prove that age was the motivating cause behind their firing or demotion. They have to show that they wouldn't have been fired or demoted but for their age.

This is different from other types of discrimination suits, where employees can win even if the employer had "mixed motives." That is, an employee can win a sex or race discrimination suit even if sex or race was simply one motive among several, and the employer was also motivated by other, legitimate considerations.

* Second, employees who sue for age discrimination now have the "burden of proof." It's up to them to show that it was more likely than not that they were fired or demoted due to age.

In other types of discrimination suits,

 

employees don't have this burden. They merely have to show some evidence that the employer acted based on sex, race, etc., and then the burden is on the employer to prove that it had an acceptable motive.

According to the Supreme Court, the reason for treating age differently from other types of discrimination is that age-bias suits are governed by a separate federal law that is worded differently from other federal discrimination laws.

However, it's important to note that the Supreme Court case only involves suits under these federal laws. Many states have their own age discrimination laws, and these might be more favorable to employees.


Line


Check the zoning rules before you buy a property


It can be a great idea to buy a “fixer-upper” – as long as you’re sure the local zoning rules will allow you to actually fix it up.

Unfortunately, many people have bought a home or other property with the idea of remodeling it to their tastes, only to discover that what they had in mind is against the law.

For instance:

• If you’re thinking of removing trees to enhance your view, is this permitted?

• If you want to create a rental unit on the property, do the local zoning rules allow for rentals? If they do, what restrictions apply?

• If you want to fill in a low-lying area,

 

will this violate environmental regulations?

• What if you want to build an additional building, such as a garage, guest house, or even a shed? Is this allowed?

• If you want to add on an additional room, will this violate rules against building too close to a property line?

Of course, if the building is on a list of historic homes or is part of a homeowner’s association, other rules will apply as well.

In general, if you’re thinking of buying a property with an eye toward improving it, check the rules first. It’s better to be safe than sorry.


Line


Did you know you can trademark a sound?


When most people think of trademarks, they think of names of things – or of words, phrases, logos or images used to promote a product in the marketplace.

But did you know you can also trademark a sound? You can, if it’s distinctive enough, it’s tied to your product, and you meet other requirements.

Consider these sounds, which are protected by trademark law:

• The roar of the MGM lion.

• “Hello, and welcome to Moviefone!”

• “You are now free to move about the country.”

• The Pillsbury Doughboy’s giggle.

• NBC’s three chimes.

• “AF-LAC!”

• The Jolly Green Giant’s “ho, ho, ho.”

• “You’ve got mail!”

• Homer Simpson’s “D’oh!”

 

Other odd – but true – trademarks include the color pink for Owens-Corning fiberglass, the smell of a sewing thread, and the shape of Toblerone chocolate bars.

On the other hand, the Campbell Soup Company tried – and failed – to trademark the use of the color red on one-half of a soup can.

A current lawsuit involves rival companies that operate tours in amphibious vehicles and give tourists kazoos that make a quacking noise. A company called Ride the Ducks says it owns the rights to the noise made by its “Wacky Quacker” device, and is demanding that a company called Bay Quackers stop handing out similar kazoos.



This newsletter is designed to keep you up-to-date with changes in the law. For help with these or any other legal issues, please call our firm today.

The information in this newsletter is intended solely for your information. It does not constitute legal advice, and it should not be relied on without a discussion of your specific situation with an attorney.

38.107.191.91/5.93